🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in distribution within civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, delayed for at least 12 months after the bill passes.

International experts actually suggests a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We reside in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and gather the crop and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator commented: “The company operates its activities following with applicable local laws. Further, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which enable relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, adding that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.