🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for Zohran now. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I think occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed major surprises on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.