Trump Declares Deal Plan Isn't 'Final Offer' as Delegates Assemble for Swiss Meeting
Former President Donald Trump indicated this past weekend that the Russian-prepared peace plan constituted "not my final offer", after strong reaction from Ukrainian leaders and commentators that likened it to the Munich pact of 1938 between Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler.
In brief remarks at the White House, Trump informed journalists: "Weâd like to get to peace. It shouldâve happened a long time ago ⌠weâre trying to get it ended, in any case it must be resolved."
Forthcoming Geneva Negotiations Include Various Nations
Ukrainian and American delegates will meet in Geneva this Sunday to discuss this proposal. Defense representatives from France, Britain and Germany will also participate in the talks there.
Prior to these discussions, US senators informed media outlets that State Department head Marco Rubio contacted them during his travel to Switzerland to clarify the nature of this disclosed proposal. According to him, the proposal "was not the administrationâs plan" but instead a "wish list of the Russians", as reported by Senator King, who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Zelenskyy Confronts Critical Deadline
However, Trump has given Volodymyr Zelenskyy until Thursday to sign this multi-point agreement. The document requires Kyiv to cede land it currently controls to Russia, downsize its military forces, and relinquish advanced weaponry. It also excludes a European peacekeeping force and sanctions for atrocities committed by Russia.
In a sombre address last Friday, the Ukrainian leader warned that his country confronts a difficult decision in the near future involving preserving the nation's honor and losing a major partner in the shape of the US. Zelenskyy acknowledged that Ukraine is experiencing an extremely challenging period in its history.
Ukraine's Negotiating Delegation Formed for Upcoming Talks
Speaking on Saturday, Zelenskyy emphasized that genuine or respectable peace was always based on "guaranteed security and justice". He announced a negotiating team, appointed by presidential decree, that would soon meet American representatives in Switzerland, headed by top aide Yermak.
A additional delegate of the Ukrainian delegation, former defence minister and security council official Rustem Umerov, said they will hold consultations with the US "on the possible parameters of a future peace agreement".
Suggesting limits, he added: Ukraine enters these talks with defined goals. This is another stage of the dialogue that has been ongoing in recent days and is primarily aimed at aligning our vision for the next steps."
International Reaction and Concerns
Zelenskyy has attempted to engage constructively with the US administration apparently intent to resolve the war based on Russian conditions. He has made clear he cannot give up Ukraineâs sovereignty or abandon the constitutional framework that enshrines Ukraine's territorial integrity.
During a summit held in South Africa, G20 leaders and the European Council released a collective declaration opposing the proposed deal, saying it needs further refinement. It said that members of the EU and NATO would need to be consulted on some of its provisions, which rule out Kyivâs Nato membership and put conditions on its future EU accession.
Public Opinion in Ukraine's Capital
Responses from Ukrainians to the text, drawn up by a Russian representative and a US delegate, has been overwhelmingly hostile. Commentators said it was a blueprint for further Russian aggression: targeting not just Ukraine but of other parts of Europe too.
Mustafa Nayyem, a public figure involved in Ukraineâs 2014 pro-democracy Maidan revolution, remarked it drew comparisons with the Munich Agreement. Trumpsâs peace plan belonged to the same "recognisable genre", with the victim invited to outline its own surrender for broader convenience.
In a Facebook post, Nayyem said his anger by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. This offended people who had hidden in basements in Bucha or Mariupol â where Russian troops executed hundreds of civilians â and for those whose children had been forcibly deported to Russia. A deeply cynical deal, he concluded.
In an interview in Kyivâs Golden Gate metro station, Dmytro Sariskyi, a young adult, commented that Russia had been trying to control Ukraine politically and territorially over many years. The agreement offered "barely anything" in the proposed deal and continued to keep troops in Ukraine. In my view, this deal aims to undermine Ukraine and impose unfair terms, he said.
If Zelenskyy signed off on the proposals Kyiv would be forced to sacrifice its liberties, he said. If rejected, the US would most likely break off cooperation and intelligence sharing, a crucial source of battlefield information for frontline Ukrainian troops. "There is no good way out of this for now," he noted.
Varied Viewpoints from the Public
Another passenger, teenager Barchan, said that Ukraine would "keep strong" without American support. "We will fight for as long as it takes. Crimea and the eastern regions are part of Ukraine. It belongs to Ukraine." She expressed Zelenskyy was a "smart person" and predicted he would not cede territory.
Speaking during rainfall, next to a replica of Kyivâs original medieval gate, Olena Ivanovna mentioned she was grateful to Trump for his attempts to broker peace. She said that the nation ought to consider ceding certain regions for a limited time if it meant keeping America as a partner. "President Zelenskyy should hold a referendum and ask the people," she said.
EU Leaders Condemn the Plan
Former European heads of state have strongly criticized this proposal. Ex-PM of Finland Marin called it a disaster, not only for Ukraine and Ukrainians but for democracies worldwide. She said if Western nations display vulnerability â similar to the 2014 Crimea annexation â further hostilities could arise.
Belgium's ex-PM, Guy Verhofstadt, quoted Churchillâs definition of an appeaser as "one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last". He added: "Trump now takes Putinâs side. Europe must choose again: appeasement or our values, imperialism or freedom. A critical juncture for the European Union."